First-trimester screening for Down syndrome using nuchal translucency measurement with free β-hCG and PAPP-A between 10 and 13 weeks of pregnancy—the combined test

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. De Biasio ◽  
M. Siccardi ◽  
G. Volpe ◽  
L. Famularo ◽  
F. Santi ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 833-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fran�oise Muller ◽  
Clarisse Benattar ◽  
Fran�ois Audibert ◽  
Nathalie Roussel ◽  
Sophie Dreux ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 1105-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Marie Schiøtt ◽  
Michael Christiansen ◽  
Olav Bjørn Petersen ◽  
Tina Lind Sørensen ◽  
Niels Uldbjerg

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 901-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoni Borrell ◽  
Anna Gonce ◽  
Josep M. Martinez ◽  
Virginia Borobio ◽  
Albert Fortuny ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P Bestwick ◽  
Wayne J Huttly ◽  
Nicholas J Wald

Objectives To examine the effect of smoking on three first trimester screening markers for Down's syndrome that constitute the Combined test, namely nuchal translucency (NT), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free β human chorionic gonadotophin (free β-hCG) and to use the results to determine which of these markers need to be adjusted for smoking and by how much. Methods The difference in the median multiple of the median (MoM) values in smokers compared to non-smokers was determined for NT, PAPP-A and free β-hCG in 12,517 unaffected pregnancies that had routine first trimester Combined test screening. These results were then included in a meta-analysis of published studies and the effect of adjusting for smoking on screening performance of the Combined test was estimated. Results The results using the routine screening data were similar to the summary estimates from the meta-analysis of all studies. The results from the meta-analysis were; median MoM in smokers compared to non-smokers: 1.06 NT (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.10), 0.81 PAPP-A (0.80 to 0.83) and 0.94 free β-hCG (0.89 to 0.99). The effect of adjusting for smoking on the Combined test is small, with an estimated less than half percentage point increase in the detection rate (the proportion of affected pregnancies with a positive result) for a 3% false-positive rate (the proportion of unaffected pregnancies with a positive result) and less than 0.2 percentage point decrease in the false-positive rate for an 85% detection rate. Conclusion Adjusting first trimester screening markers for smoking has a minimal favourable effect on screening performance, but it is simple to implement and this paper provides the adjustment factors needed if a decision is made to make such an adjustment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document